god the invisible king-第3部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！

with　this　bias。　　He　has　found　this　faith　growing　　up　in　himself；　he　has　found　it；　or　something　very　difficult　to　　distinguish　from　it；　growing　independently　in　the　minds　of　men　and　　women　he　has　met。　　They　have　been　people　of　very　various　origins；　　English；　Americans；　Bengalis；　Russians；　French；　people　brought　up　in　　a　〃Catholic　atmosphere；〃　Positivists；　Baptists；　Sikhs；　Mohammedans。　　　Their　diversity　of　source　is　as　remarkable　as　their　convergence　of　　tendency。　　A　miscellany　of　minds　thinking　upon　parallel　lines　has　　come　out　to　the　same　light。　　The　new　teaching　is　also　traceable　in　　many　professedly　Christian　religious　books　and　it　is　to　be　heard　　from　Christian　pulpits。　　The　phase　of　definition　is　manifestly　at　　hand。

2。　MODERN　RELIGION　HAS　A　FINITE　GOD

Perhaps　the　most　fundamental　difference　between　this　new　faith　and　　any　recognised　form　of　Christianity　is　that；　knowingly　or　　unknowingly；　it　worships　A　FINITE　GOD。　　Directly　the　believer　is　　fairly　confronted　with　the　plain　questions　of　the　case；　the　vague　　identifications　that　are　still　carelessly　made　with　one　or　all　of　　the　persons　of　the　Trinity　dissolve　away。　　He　will　admit　that　his　　God　is　neither　all…wise；　nor　all…powerful；　nor　omnipresent；　that　he　　is　neither　the　maker　of　heaven　nor　earth；　and　that　he　has　little　to　　identify　him　with　that　hereditary　God　of　the　Jews　who　became　the　　〃Father〃　in　the　Christian　system。　　On　the　other　hand　he　will　assert　　that　his　God　is　a　god　of　salvation；　that　he　is　a　spirit；　a　person；　a　　strongly　marked　and　knowable　personality；　loving；　inspiring；　and　　lovable；　who　exists　or　strives　to　exist　in　every　human　soul。　　He　　will　be　much　less　certain　in　his　denials　that　his　God　has　a　close　　resemblance　to　the　Pauline　（as　distinguished　from　the　Trinitarian）　　〃Christ。〃　。　。　。　The　modern　religious　man　will　almost　certainly　profess　a　kind　of　　universalism；　he　will　assert　that　whensoever　men　have　called　upon　　any　God　and　have　found　fellowship　and　comfort　and　courage　and　that　　sense　of　God　within　them；　that　inner　light　which　is　the　quintessence　　of　the　religious　experience；　it　was　the　True　God　that　answered　them。　　　For　the　True　God　is　a　generous　God；　not　a　jealous　God；　the　very　　antithesis　of　that　bickering　monopolist　who　〃will　have　none　other　　gods　but　Me〃；　and　when　a　human　heart　cries　outto　what　name　it　　matters　notfor　a　larger　spirit　and　a　stronger　help　than　the　　visible　things　of　life　can　give；　straightway　the　nameless　Helper　is　　with　it　and　the　God　of　Man　answers　to　the　call。　　The　True　God　has　no　　scorn　nor　hate　for　those　who　have　accepted　the　many…handed　symbols　　of　the　Hindu　or　the　lacquered　idols　of　China。　　Where　there　is　faith；　　where　there　is　need；　there　is　the　True　God　ready　to　clasp　the　hands　　that　stretch　out　seeking　for　him　into　the　darkness　behind　the　ivory　　and　gold。　The　fact　that　God　is　FINITE　is　one　upon　which　those　who　think　　clearly　among　the　new　believers　are　very　insistent。　　He　is；　above　　everything　else；　a　personality；　and　to　be　a　personality　is　to　have　　characteristics；　to　be　limited　by　characteristics；　he　is　a　Being；　　not　us　but　dealing　with　us　and　through　us；　he　has　an　aim　and　that　　means　he　has　a　past　and　future；　he　is　within　time　and　not　outside　　it。　　And　they　point　out　that　this　is　really　what　everyone　who　prays　　sincerely　to　God　or　gets　help　from　God；　feels　and　believes。　　Our　　practice　with　God　is　better　than　our　theory。　　None　of　us　really　pray　　to　that　fantastic；　unqualified　danse　a　trois；　the　Trinity；　which　the　　wranglings　and　disputes　of　the　worthies　of　Alexandria　and　Syria　　declared　to　be　God。　　We　pray　to　one　single　understanding　person。　　　But　so　far　the　tactics　of　those　Trinitarians　at　Nicaea；　who　stuck　　their　fingers　in　their　ears；　have　prevailed　in　this　world；　this　was　　no　matter　for　discussion；　they　declared；　it　was　a　Holy　Mystery　full　　of　magical　terror；　and　few　religious　people　have　thought　it　worth　　while　to　revive　these　terrors　by　a　definite　contradiction。　　The　　truly　religious　have　been　content　to　lapse　quietly　into　the　　comparative　sanity　of　an　unformulated　Arianism；　they　have　left　it　to　　the　scoffing　Atheist　to　mock　at　the　patent　absurdities　of　the　　official　creed。　　But　one　magnificent　protest　against　this　　theological　fantasy　must　have　been　the　work　of　a　sincerely　religious　　man；　the　cold　superb　humour　of　that　burlesque　creed；　ascribed；　at　　first　no　doubt　facetiously　and　then　quite　seriously；　to　Saint　　Athanasius　the　Great；　which；　by　an　irony　far　beyond　its　original　　intention；　has　become　at　last　the　accepted　creed　of　the　church。　The　long　truce　in　the　criticism　of　Trinitarian　theology　is　drawing　　to　its　end。　　It　is　when　men　most　urgently　need　God　that　they　become　　least　patient　with　foolish　presentations　and　dogmas。　　The　new　　believers　are　very　definitely　set　upon　a　thorough　analysis　of　the　　nature　and　growth　of　the　Christian　creeds　and　ideas。　　There　has　　grown　up　a　practice　of　assuming　that；　when　God　is　spoken　of；　the　　Hebrew…Christian　God　of　Nicaea　is　meant。　　But　that　God　trails　with　　him　a　thousand　misconceptions　and　bad　associations；　his　alleged　　infinite　nature；　his　jealousy；　his　strange　preferences；　his　　vindictive　Old　Testament　past。　　These　things　do　not　even　make　a　　caricature　of　the　True　God；　they　compose　an　altogether　different　and　　antagonistic　figure。　It　is　a　very　childish　and　unphilosophical　set　of　impulses　that　has　　led　the　theologians　of　nearly　every　faith　to　claim　infinite　　qualities　for　their　deity。　　One　has　to　remember　the　poorness　of　the　　mental　and　moral　quality　of　the　churchmen　of　the　third；　fourth；　and　　fifth　centuries　who　saddled　Christendom　with　its　characteristic　　dogmas；　and　the　extreme　poverty　and　confusion　of　the　circle　of　ideas　　within　which　they　thought。　　Many　of　these　makers　of　Christianity；　　like　Saint　Ambrose　of　Milan　（who　had　even　to　be　baptised　after　his　　election　to　his　bishopric）；　had　been　pitchforked　into　the　church　　from　civil　life；　they　lived　in　a　time　of　pitiless　factions　and　　personal　feuds；　they　had　to　conduct　their　disputations　amidst　the　　struggles　of　would…be　emperors；　court　eunuchs　and　favourites　swayed　　their　counsels；　and　popular　rioting　clinched　their　decisions。　　There　　was　less　freedom　of　discussion　then　in　the　Christian　world　than　　there　is　at　present　（1916）　in　Belgium；　and　the　whole　audience　of　　educated　opinion　by　which　a　theory　could　be　judged　did　not　equal；　　either　in　numbers　or　accuracy　of　information；　the　present　population　　of　Constantinople。　　To　these　conditions　we　owe　the　claim　that　the　　Christian　God　is　a　magic　god；　very　great　medicine　in　battle；　〃in　hoc　　signo　vinces；〃　and　the　argument　so　natural　to　the　minds　of　those　　days　and　so　absurd　to　ours；　that　since　he　had　ALL　power；　all　　knowledge；　and　existed　for　ever　and　ever；　it　was　no　use　whatever　to　　set　up　any　other　god　against　him。　。　。　。　By　the　fifth　century　Christianity　had　adopted　as　its　fundamental　　belief；　without　which　everyone　was　to　be　〃damned　everlastingly；〃　a　　conception　of　God　and　of　Christ's　relation　to　God；　of　which　even　by　　the　Christian　account　of　his　teaching；　Jesus　was　either　totally　　unaware　or　so　negligent　and　careless　of　the　future　comfort　of　his　　disciples　as　scarcely　to　make　mention。　　The　doctrine　of　the　Trinity；　　so　far　as　the　relationship　of　the　Third　Person　goes；　hangs　almost　　entirely　upon　one　ambiguous　and　disputed　utterance　in　St。　John's　　gospel　（XV。　26）。　　Most　of　the　teachings　of　Christian　orthodoxy　　resolve　themselves　to　the　attentive　student　into　assertions　of　the　　nature　of　contradiction　and　repartee。　　Someone　floats　an　opinion　in　　some　matter　that　has　been　hitherto　vague；　in　regard；　for　example；　to　　the　sonship　of　Christ　or　to　the　method　of　his　birth。　　The　new　　opinion　arouses　the　hostility　and　alarm　of　minds　unaccustomed　to　so　　definite　a　statement；　and　in　the　zeal　of　their　recoil　they　fly　to　a　　contrary　proposition。　　The　Christians　would　neither　admit　that　they　　worshipped　more　gods　than　one　because　of　the　Greeks；　nor　deny　the　　divinity　of　Christ　because　of　the　Jews。　　They　dreaded　to　be　　polytheistic；　equally　did　they　dread　the　least　apparent　detraction　　from　the　power　and　importance　of　their　Saviour。　　They　were　forced　　into　the　theory　of　the　Trinity　by　the　necessity　of　those　contrary　　assertions；　and　they　had　to　make　it　a　mystery　protected　by　curses　to　　save　it　from　a　reductio　ad　absurdam。　　The　entire　history　of　the　　growth　of　the　Christian　doctrine　in　those　disordered　early　centuries　　is　a　history　of　theology　by　committee；　a　history　of　furious　　wrangling；　of　hasty　compromises；　and　still　more　hasty　attempts　to　　clinch　matters　by　anathema。　　When　the　muddle　was　at　its　very　worst；　　the　church　was　confronted　by　enormous　political　opportunities。　　In　　order　that　it　should　seize　these　one　chief　thing　appeared　　imperative：　doctrinal　uniformity。　　The　emperor　himself；　albeit　　unbaptised　and　very　ignorant　of　Greek；　came　and　seated　himself　in　　the　midst　of　Christian　thought　upon　a　golden　throne。　　At　the　end　of　　it　all　Eusebius；　that　supreme　Trimmer；　was　prepared　to　damn　　everlastingly　all　those　who　doubted　that　consubstantiality　he　　himself　had　doubted　at　the　beginning　of　the　conference。　　It　is　quite　　clear　that　Constantine　did　not　care　who　was　damned　or　for　what　　period；　so　long　as　the　Christians　ceased　to　wrangle　among　　themselves。　　The　practical　unanimity　of　Nicaea　was　secur